Friday, January 8, 2021

Rememerbing Harold Mulherin by Mike Maloney

Harold Mulherin III — RIP

by

Michael T. Maloney

Professor Emeritus

John E. Walker Department of Economics

January 3, 2021

Harold used to love to say, “I’m working for Mike Maloney.” It was a play on the movie, Blazing Saddles, where Slim Pickens confronts Dom Deluise with a similar line. Appropriate because Harold and I probably watched Blazing Saddles together a thousand times usually waking up mid-way through the second loop of the VHS, and I did hire Harold. Back in 1985. I hired him over the phone based on nothing but a second-hand recommendation from Ben Klein through Matt Lindsay and the knowledge he was from Savannah. Sometimes shooting from the hip pays off.

Harold and I were rowdy friends straight off. Probably too rowdy. I could tell a million stories about our revelry, fun and reckless, but just one will do. My first trip to France enjoyed his company. My wife and I met him in Paris in route to Brussels for a conference. My wife planned several stops at cathedrals along the way, to which I gave a grave and doubtful look. Harold said, “Don’t worry. Next to every cathedral is a pub.” He was right. We were told by Marty that we missed the thumb (or was it nose?) of John the Baptist, but the beer was good. True to our Scotch-Irish stock, we always drank standing because in France it is cheaper that way.

I’ll leave the other tales for another time, but more interesting are the subtle stories, like the pre-historic sea-monster found in the Savannah city pond, which was, in fact, a tarpon placed there by his own self and companions. The story was told to me in snippets over a period of 10 years. It was like Old Man and the Sea. It involved his father, and tarpon fishing, and a reel with a bird’s nest of tangled line, and a fish that stayed dormant on the bottom until the line was untangled, and drinking too much, and not ever drinking again, and the meaning of life. It unfolded in disjoint segments like a Quintin Tarantino movie. I finally pieced it all together, and it was who Harold was to me. No doubt, others have had their own revealing moments because Harold was a complicated character.

However, his scholarship was uncomplicated. Collect a pile of data and see what it says. And he did time and again. He came to Clemson with a dissertation job-market paper that was a killer. He had read 10,000+ natural gas contracts and had laid out a theory consistent with the evidence that explained why, for instance, sometimes the well owner paid for the feeder line and sometimes the pipeline company did so. I had already hired him but needed to push him through the hoops so he gave his paper. It is still in my lecture notes. His presentation style was a bit too flippant for some, but that’s a chairman’s job: throw oil on the seas of discontent.

Harold and Mason Gerety started a project of dubious promise. They were hand collecting NYSE volume data from the beginning. Why wasn’t clear. Matt and I were content to let them run with it; Bobby, less so. Nonetheless, they collected data, day and night, for a year. They clocked more hours than Mark Mitchell who was always last to leave Sirrine at night and often beat me in the next morning. In the end, Harold and Mason were able to say something profound in my opinion. Trading patterns reflect the Fisherian principle: assets trade to allocate risk to those most capable of bearing it.[1]

In the late ‘80s, one of my Master’s students got the idea of looking at the stock market reaction to the Challenger Disaster. This was the blossoming of event studies. The first attempt was somewhat crude—just daily returns that pointed to the culprit—but it piqued Harold’s interest. He thought that intra-day trading would show something more profound. I was not sure he was right but he did talk me into a ten year struggle with the data from which Harold painted a picture of his Coasian belief in the magic of markets. Independent, autonomous actors using the stock market to express their insight pinpointed the cause and effect of the explosion of the space craft in essentially a matter of minutes.[2]

Harold retired several months ago. Jeff Netter asked me to try to talk him out of it. I talked, but I think my efforts actually pushed in the opposite direction. I asked Harold to join us on our last fishing trip in October. He declined probably because of declining health, which was unknown to me. I bought several new fishing rigs (Harold would not allow them to be called fishing “poles”) in anticipation of an upcoming, full-blown season with him—alas, not to be. Maybe Taylor, Skip, and I will go make the run into McQueens one more time in his memory.


[1] Trading Halts and Market Activity: An Analysis of Volume at the Open and the Close” at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04682.x

[2] “The complexity of price discovery in an efficient market: the stock market reaction to the Challenger crash” at http://maloney.people.clemson.edu/challenger.pdf

Thursday, January 7, 2021

Susan Woodward correspondence with Harold Mulherin over the Pandemic

 

Correspondence with Harold Mulherin over the Pandemic

by
Susan Woodward

January 7, 2021

 

March – is it serious?  Can I really not visit my mom? Yes. Es ist Ernst. And the announcement that Harold is retiring. I thought he might be squabbling with colleagues, not out of the question, but retire?  That seemed too much. 

May – Oliver Williamson died.  Harold reported that OW learned from James Buchannan how to get ahead in the world – go to Europe every summer, say the same thing over & over.  Harold was always aggrieved that Armen did not win a nobel prize.  But Armen was not a lobbier. Harold reminded me that when Jack Hirshleifer asked his class “why do people bet on sports games?” he answered “because it makes the beer taste better.” Jack was not ready for that creative answer, but it is a profound answer.  

August – we exchanged fantasies and strategies for getting to Europe. Harold said was ready to bolt if he could find a country to let him in. Maybe spend the rest of the pandemic in Verona. We lamented that in America, everywhere the clams are too big for a good spaghetti alle vongole, and we were missing it acutely.  Still are! 

October – Harold was full-time in Savannah, rather enjoying life there.  Page is gardening, planting collards which will be ready to harvest in early January, when it is good luck to eat them.

November – on the occasion of E Lazear’s death, Harold asked -- should Armen get credit for teaching Lazear? Harold still looking to bolster Armen’s CV.

I’m thinking especially fondly of the trip to Rome when I spent 5 days with Harold and Louise.  Lots of good food, spaghetti alle vongole, and cacio e pepe, and we made an excursion up the Aventine to Sant’Anselmo to hear the Benedictines chant the vespers. Harold was always wanting Louise and me to move faster.  It was May, and warm, and Louise said she wanted to move slow enough to not break into a sweat.  This was fine with me.” 

Related link: Susan Woodward Remembers Armen Alchian available at

https://uneasymoney.com/2015/08/19/susan-woodward-remembers-armen-alchian/

 

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

Remembering J. Harold Mulherin

J. Harold Mulherin — RIP

by

Kam-Ming Wan

January 5, 2021

 


My relationship with Harold Mulherin was a magical one and can be best described by main characters in the Harry Potter novels.  Harold was like “Albus Dumbledore” and I was like “Harry Potter.” Harold was a wise and dedicated friend and our friendship was simple: Harold was a generous giver and I was an eager taker.

With great fortunate, Jonathan Karpoff introduced Harold to me in a WFA conference in Sun Valley, Idaho in 2000. Our friendship blossomed after the passing of Professor Armen Alchian because we shared a common conviction for Armen’s inspiring works and warm personalities as well as the UCLA tradition in economics.

Harold’s devotion for the UCLA tradition was uncompromising. When Harold was the first-year doctoral student at UCLA, he earned A+ in mathematical economics and two econometric courses. Due to his outstanding quantitative abilities, he was assigned to TA for undergraduate microeconomic classes which used the Hal Varian textbook. However, this assignment was contradictory to his ultimate goal to teach UCLA tradition in economics.  Harold was courageous and declined the assignment reasoning that if he wanted to teach Professor Hal Varian’s type of economics, he would have gone to Michigan (where Professor Varian was then located) to pursue his doctoral degree. Luckily, a pareto optimal outcome was reach because he was reassigned to lead quiz sections for Professor Victor Tabbush who used Alchian & Allen (Exchange and Production). Harold was gratified and his perseverance paid off because he got the highest rankings of all teaching assistants.

Harold was an “actions speak louder than words” person. To express his admiration for Professor Alchian and the UCLA tradition, he put that in action and launched a Special Issue in the Journal of Corporate Finance to honor Professor Alchian for his intellectual contributions to our profession. To accomplish this mission, he assembled an “Order of the Phoenix” comprising his confidants and colleagues such as Susan Woodward, Michael Maloney, Duncan Cameron, Harry DeAngelo, Thomas Hazlett, and Jonathan Karpoff. The Special Issue is a “Mirror of Erised” which shows Harold’s deepest and most monumental contributions of Professor Alchian including property rights economics, theory of the firm, capital markets, and corporate governance.[1]

Harold was a “talk-the-talk and walk-the-walk” editor. His editorial leadership was proactive and similar to the Coasian style.[2] For a decade, Harold was the co-editor for the reputable Journal of Corporate Finance which was founded by Professor Ken Lehn to publish meaningful empirical papers in corporate finance. Together with Jeff Netter and Annette Poulsen, they were the fantastic trio who set a clear mission to advance the right kind of financial economics, especially those with solid theoretical foundations, real-world relevance, and policy implications.[3] 

To follow up with his “talk-the-talk” mission, Harold’s research had “walked-the-walk” since his early days at UCLA. In Harold’s dissertation, he set out to examine two fundamental economic questions: (1) what affects contractual complexity across firms? And (2) what impacts vertical integration across time? To enrich our understanding of these questions, Harold pored over 10,000 natural gas contracts between natural gas producers and pipelines. He found that natural gas contracts are more complex when producer assets are more specific (i.e., less pipelines and more producers), a result consistent with Klein, Crawford and Alchian.[4],[5] Harold also found that regulations are the main determinants of vertical integration across time. Specifically, the federal regulations in the 1930s caused vertical segmentation of the natural gas industry, whereas deregulations in the 1990s triggered vertical integration because firms were allowed to merge vertically to reduce transaction costs.[6] His dissertation shows that transaction costs and governmental regulations are essential determinants of economic organizations.

His dissertation inspired many to address meaningful economic questions including me.  I collected over 10,000 CEO compensation contracts to examine the complexity of such contracts and its relationship with CEO power because powerful CEOs are commonly misconstructed as entrenched and use flexible and opaque (i.e., less complex) contracts to obtain excessive compensation. Although compensation to some powerful CEOs are perceived as “outrageous,” these CEOs are inspirational, game changing, and irreplaceable. They are the good outliers in the business world. Do you consider $600 million in CEO compensation exceptional? If so, you should ask Apple’s shareholders whether the late Steve Jobs deserved to obtain that mega stock options grant in 2000.  Similarly, do you consider $55 billion in CEO compensation outrageous?  If so, you should ask Tesla’s shareholders whether Elon Musk deserved to obtain that massive compensation package in 2018.[7],[8]  

Harold was a “fictional” mentor to me because he was surreal: wise, caring, and protective in every meaningful ways. Our mentorship is unsophisticated: Harold gave thoughtful and timely advices which I executed willingly and delightfully. When Professor Harold Demsertz, an intellectual giant in our profession, left us, Harold was the first group of people who initiated the Demsetz conference to celebrate his lives and works. Even in his darkest hours and our most challenging circumstances, Harold always stood by me and gave me countless considerable but uncompromising advices because he truly admired Professor Demsetz’s immense contributions and the UCLA tradition. I am so sad that Harold has left us unanticipatedly. However, my memories of Harold are always alive which is similar to what Harry Potter felt after Albus Dumbledore has gone to a better place: “He [Dumbledore] will only be gone from the school [Hogwarts] when none here are loyal to him.”

The tragic loss of Harold reminds me an ancient wisdom “As is a tale, so is life: not how long it is, but how good it is, is what matters.[9] Harold’s infectious laughs, truthful friendship, honest but thoughtful advices, and uncompromising passion for good research and beers will be sorely missed.



Friday, February 1, 2019

Other Tributes to Professor Harold Demsetz

Here are some tributes to Harold Demsetz:

(A) Contributions to the Economics Profession

1. American Economic Association

2. Richard Epstein (Stanford)

3. Tom Hubbard (Northwestern)

4. David Henderson (Stanford)

5. Peter Klein (Baylor)

(B) Contributions to the Economics of Property Rights

1. Forbes

(C) Contributions to Price Theory

1.Peter Boettke (GMU)


(D) Contributions to Law and Economics

1.Henry Smith (Harvard)

(E) Contributions to UCLA Econ Department: Colleague and Mentor

1.Ben Klein (UCLA)


2.David Henderson (Stanford)

If you have any tributes to Harold Demsetz and want to include in this list, please email me at kmwan@polyu.edu.hk

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Remembering Harold Demsetz: The Glory Days at UCLA


Eulogy on Harold Demsetz
Kam-Ming Wan
School of Accounting and Finance
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
January 12, 2019



The Economics profession has lost a giant when Professor Harold Demsetz passed away on January 4, 2019. He was 88 years old. Harold was influential in many fields of economics including Law and Economics, Economics of organization, and Industrial Organization. Like Armen Alchian, Arnold Harberger, Jack Hirshleifer, and Ben Klein, he was the heart and soul of the Economics Department at UCLA.



Harold’s papers are original and highly influential. His most well-known article is “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,” with Armen Alchian. This article uses the difficulty of metering input productivity and rewards to explain the structure of economic organization. This paper was one of the most cited papers in Economics and was selected as a “top 20” article in the past century published in the American Economic Review. To demonstrate its prestige, 70% of the “top 20” articles are written by Nobel laureates.

His contributions in Economics have been extensively written about and deeply appreciated. The best summary of his contributions is available from the American Economic Association (AEA) website (https://www.aeaweb.org/about-aea/honors-awards/distinguished-fellows/harold-demsetz) when he was named the distinguished fellow of AEA in 2013:

“Harold Demsetz is one of the most creative and deep microeconomists of the 20th century.  Several of his contributions anticipated subsequent research by years or even decades, and have offered unusually insightful analyses of fundamental problems of economic theory.

Like Armen Alchian, his best works were monumental and important to all fields of Economics. Many people in the profession believe that the duo (Armen Alchian and Harold Demsetz) deserved to win the Nobel Prize for their contributions to the theory of the firm and the economics of property rights. In private conversations, this sentiment was echoed by Professor Gary Becker (Nobel laureate in Economics in 1992) when he visited the University of Hong Kong in 2010 and Professor Ray Ball (University of Chicago) when he gave a keynote speech at the JIAR conference in Sao Paulo in 2015.  Sadly, this recognition never came to either one of them.

Nevertheless, Harold’s influences on mentoring PhD students were less extensively discussed. Back in the old days at UCLA, Harold mentored many PhD students. Many graduate students harbored the impression that Harold was tough and occasionally intimidating, especially his Chicago-style penetrating questions during workshops. I recalled an incident when John Lott (then affiliated with University of Chicago) presented a paper at UCLA, Harold asked him a fundamental question which John paused for 10-15 seconds. Harold immediately commented in a half-jokingly manner: “you are too slow and how can you survive in Chicago?” Students raised their eyebrows for his rigor on the speaker.

However, I have a completely different view of Harold.  The following is a true story. In 1993, I was admitted to the doctoral program in Economics at UCLA. However, there was a problem because UCLA did not offer me any scholarship. Because pursuing a doctoral program at UCLA was my dream, I decided to roll a dice. With enormous support from my family, friends and HKU mentors, I raised just sufficient funding to survive the first year at UCLA.

Due to the financial hardship, I was nervous and under tremendous pressure to perform at UCLA. But, unnecessary pressure is bad for good research, especially for nurturing original ideas which Armen Alchian and Harold Demsetz knew and knew it well. To lessen my financial constraint, the duo “adopted” me. Armen told me to do two things: first “to relax” and second “you are too skinny and eat more.” Then, Harold followed up and fed me: literally by hiring me as his research assistant; and intellectually by showing me how to do research. Even after I had received departmental funding, Harold continued to feed me until the day I graduated.

Harold also took me under his wing and served as my dissertation chair. He held high standards on research and loved to discuss original ideas. Nevertheless, he had low tolerance on poor writing. I fondly recalled an incident. In my final year, I needed to present my dissertation in the IO workshop. Knowing that Harold had high standards on writing and I am a non-native speaker, I spent countless of hours writing (and revising) my dissertation, hoping to impress him. I also begged two of my classmates, who are native speakers graduated from Harvard, to proof read my dissertation. However, shortly after I finished my introduction in the workshop, Harold jumped in and criticized my writing in front of everyone. I was truly embarrassed, dejected and wanted to find a place to hide.

A few days later, Harold summoned me to his office and showed me my dissertation full of pencil markings. Armen did the same thing subsequently. I read (and re-read) their markings many times and realized they were excellent corrections.  Since then, I wake up every morning and think about the duo and whether my writing is clear enough to satisfy their standards. In retrospect, I am grateful to Harold for this incident and his fatherly-like honesty to make me a better writer and scholar.

Even after my graduation, Harold was always standing on my shoulder and gave me useful advice in research and life until mid-2017. Harold was a warm, funny and very kind man. He tried to help me and other graduate students in every possible ways, like a father does to his child. I am delighted that Harold had lived a full and meaningful life.  But, I am truly sad that he left us this early.  He will be sorely missed.


哈羅德*德姆塞茨教授的悼詞
尹錦銘
香港理工大學會計及金融學院助理教授
2019112

當哈羅德*德姆塞茨教授於201914日去世時,經濟學界已經失去了一個巨人。他是88歲。哈羅德在許多經濟學領域有影響力,包括法律和經濟學,組織經濟學和工業組織。像阿爾欽(Armen Alchian),阿諾德*哈伯格爾(Arnold Harberger),傑克*赫什萊弗(Jack Hirshleifer),本傑明*克萊因(Ben Klein),他是加州大學洛杉磯分校的經濟學系的心臟和靈魂。

哈羅德的論文是原創和極具影響力的。他最著名的文章是與Armen Alchian "產,信息成本和經濟組織"。這文利用計量投入的難度、生產率和報酬來解釋經濟組織的結構。這文是經濟學中引用最多的論文之一,並被選為在過去的一個世紀發表在美國經濟評論的"top20"文章。為了彰顯其威信,"20"70%由諾貝爾獎得主撰寫。

他在經濟學方面的貢獻被廣泛地寫入,並深為讚賞。他的貢獻最好的總結可從美國經濟協會(AEA)網站(https://www.aeaweb.org/about-aea/honors-awards/distinguished-fellows/harold-demsetz)當他在2013年被任命為AEA的傑出研究員時:

"Harold Demsetz20世紀最有創意和最深刻的微觀經濟學家之一。 他的幾個貢獻預期隨後的研究多年甚至幾十年,並提供了經濟理論的基本問題異常有見地的分析。"

Armen Alchian一樣,他最好的作品對所有的經濟學領域都是巨大的和重要的。許多行內人認為,二人(阿爾欽Alchian和哈羅德Demsetz)應該得到諾貝爾獎,他們對公司的理論和財產權利的經濟學的貢獻巨大。在私人談話中,這一情緒得到了1992年諾貝爾經濟學獎得主Gary Becker 教授和芝加哥大學Ray Ball教授的同意。可悲的是,他們都沒有獲得過諾貝爾獎。

然而,哈羅德對指導博士生的影響不那麼廣泛討論。早在過去的日子在加州大學洛杉磯分校,哈羅德輔導許多博士生。許多研究生的印像是,哈羅德是艱難的,偶爾嚇人,尤其是他芝加哥式的問題。我回憶起一件事,當約翰*洛特(當時隸屬於芝加哥大學)在加州大學洛杉磯分校出席一個研究研討會,哈羅德問他一個根本性的問題,約翰停頓了10-15秒。哈羅德立即以半開玩笑的方式評論說:"你太慢了,你怎麼能在芝加哥生存?" 學生意識到他對研討會講者的高要求

但是,我對哈羅德的看法完全不同。以下是一個真實的故事。 1993年,我被加州大學洛杉磯分校經濟學博士課程錄取。然而,我有財政困難,因為加州大學洛杉磯分校沒有給我任何獎學金。在加州大學洛杉磯分校攻讀博士學位是我的夢想,所以我決定擲骰子。在家人、朋友和港大校友的鼎力支持下,我剛籌得足夠的資金,在加州大學洛杉磯分校求學一年。

由於財政困難,我很緊張,並感到巨大壓力。但是,不必要的壓力對良好的研究不利,特別是對於培養原創想法。阿爾欽和哈羅德*德姆塞茨知道並很清楚這個問題。為了減輕我的財務壓力,二人"收養"了我。 Armen告訴我做兩件事:第一"放鬆"和第二"你太瘦,多吃點"。然後,哈羅德跟進,財政上支持我:僱用我為他的研究助理和教我如何做研究。即使在我獲得了部門資助之後,哈羅德仍然繼續財政上支持我,直到我畢業的那天。

哈羅德也把我帶到他的翅膀下,擔任我的論文主席。他堅持高標準的研究和喜愛討論原創的想法。儘管如此,他對寫作的要求很高。我回憶起一件事, 在我的最後一年,我需要在IO研討會上提出我的論文。知道哈羅德要求有高標準的寫作我是一個非英語母語的作家,我花了無數的時間寫作(和修改)我的論文,希望能打動他。我也懇求兩個英語母語從哈佛畢業同學的幫助,以編輯我的論文。然而,在研討會上,我完成了我論文介紹以後,Harold在大家前面開始批評我的寫作。我真的很尷尬,沮喪,想找個地方躲起來。

幾天后,哈羅德召喚我到他的辦公室,給了我一篇充滿了鉛筆標記的論文。阿爾欽後來做了同樣的事情。我多次閱讀(和重新閱讀)他們在我論文上寫下來的鉛筆標記,並意識到他們是優秀的更正。從那時起,我每天早上醒來,想想二人,我的寫作是否足夠清晰,以滿足他們的標準。回想起來,我很感激哈羅德的這一事件和他的慈父般的誠實,使我成為一個更好的作家和學者

即使在我畢業之後,哈羅德總是站在我的肩膀上,並給我在研究和生活中有用建議,直到2017中旬。哈羅德是一個熱情,有趣,非常友好的人。他試圖幫助我和其他研究生在各種可能的方式,像父親對待他的孩子一樣。我很高興哈羅德過著充實而有意義的生活。但是,我真的很難過,他這麼早離開我們。我們非常想念他。